Case Law › High Court › Itxa/416/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/416/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Shapoorji And Co

High Court 03 Jul 2006 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/416/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Shapoorji And Co, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, Income-Tax therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.416 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Petitioner. V/s. M/s.Shapoorji & Co. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for petitioner. Mr.Porus Kaka i/b. Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the revenue. No substantial question of law arises since the issue sought to be raised is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of M.V.Sonvala V/s. Commissioner ofIncome-Tax reported in 177 I.T.R.246. The appeal is, Income-Tax therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.