Itxa/4162/2010 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn. Ltd
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4162/2010 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn. Ltd
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/4162/2010 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn. Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be 280 I.T.R.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.573 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.573 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
ICICI Bank Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.N.Kotangale with P.S. Sahderan for appellant.
Mr.S.P.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal in view of the Judgment of
the Apex Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. V/s.Commissioner of Income-tax and Ors. reported in (2006)280 I.T.R. 643 (S.C.). The appeal is allowed to be
280 I.T.R. 643 (S.C.)
withdrawn and dismissed as such.
2. Court fees be refunded as per rules.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue