Itxa/418/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tacke Wind Energy India P. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/418/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tacke Wind Energy India P. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/418/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tacke Wind Energy India P. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Tacke Wind Energy India P.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Ms.A.Vissanjee with S.J.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned for the appellant and the
respondent. The appeal seeks to raise the following
substantial questions of law :-
a) Whether the foreign exchange losses suffered by
the assessee on the revenue account on account of
fluctuation in foreign exchange on the last date
of the accounting year ending March 31, 2001 (i.e.
the assessment year in question) being a
contingent notional liability was allowable, as
deduction under the Income Tax Act ?
b) Whether the foreign exchange losses arisen on
account of revaluation of the foreign exchange
borrowings utilized on revenue account was not
allowable as deduction under the Income Tax Act as
repayments of these borrowings fell after the
accounting year under consideration and,
therefore, liability for such losses did not arise
in the accounting year under consideration ?
c) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case
and in law, the ITAT was justified in ignoring the
- = : 2 : = -
fact that method of accounting as per AS 11 is not
the deciding factor for allowability or otherwise
of a deduction claimed and also that for accrual
of liability, it is necessary that the assessee is
obliged to discharge the same ?
d) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case
and in law, the ITAT was justified in upholding
the order of CIT(A) in allowing foreign exchange
fluctuation loss ignoring the fact that the loss
was notional as a result of restatement of
liabilities and not actual loss qualifying for
deduction as expenditure ?
2. All the issues raised in this appeal
relates to the question of foreign exchange loss
suffered by the assessee on revenue account of
fluctuation in foreign exchange on the last date of
the accounting year ending 31st March, 2001. The
issues raised herein is squarely covered by the Apex
Court judgment in the case of Commissioner of Income
Commissioner of Income
Tax, Delhi V/s. M/s.Woodward Governor India P.Ltd.in Civil Appeal No.2206 of 2009 along with other matters decided on 8th April, 2009. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in
this appeal. Appeal is dismissed in limini with no
order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
- = : 3 : = -
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.