Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-9..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate i/b. Padma Diwakar, for the Appellant.Mr. P. J. Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate i/b. A. K. Jasani, for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 6[th] FEBRUARY, 2013. Heard. 2In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 1998-99, the following question of law has been raised for our consideration:- “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in allowing the long term capital loss of Rs.35,58,718/- on account of redemption of preference shares?” 3Since the Tribunal in the impugned order has allowed the claim of the Respondent-Assessee by following the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Anarkali Sarabhai v/s. Commissioner of Income S.R.JOSHI1 of 2 Tax, reported in 224 ITR 422, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan