Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd
High Court
06 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/418/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate i/b. Padma Diwakar, for the Appellant.Mr. P. J. Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate i/b. A. K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
P.C:-
CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 6[th] FEBRUARY, 2013.
Heard.
2In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 1998-99, the following question of law has been raised for our consideration:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in allowing the long term capital loss of Rs.35,58,718/- on account of redemption of preference shares?”
3Since the Tribunal in the impugned order has allowed the claim of the Respondent-Assessee by following the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Anarkali Sarabhai v/s. Commissioner of Income S.R.JOSHI1 of 2
Tax, reported in 224 ITR 422, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.