Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 Mumbai v. M/S. Nova Advertising Palace P. Ltd

High Court 10 Oct 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 Mumbai v. M/S. Nova Advertising Palace P. Ltd
Date of order
10 Oct 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/4193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 Mumbai v. M/S. Nova Advertising Palace P. Ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, as the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1171 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1171 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Nova Advertising Palace P.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango for appellant. Mr.J.I.Patel i/b. B.V.Jhaveri for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH OCTOBER, 2006. DATED : 10TH OCTOBER, 2006. P.C. :- Heard Mr.Kango in support of the Motion. Mr.Patel appears for the respondent. The tax liability in this matter is just Rs.1,31,595/-, which is seen from para 11 of this appeal memo. The Central Board of Direct Tax has issued a Circular / instructions dated 29/6/2000 instructing the Tax Officers not to file appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-. This Court has dismissed many appeals on the ground that the tax liability was less than Rs.4,00,000/- and Mr.Patel has drawn our attention to one such order passed by the Division Bench of our Court in the case of C.I.T. V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works reported in 276 I.T.R. 519. In that view of the matter, as the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, the appeal stands dismissed. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan