Itxa/4200/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mummbai v. M/S Piem Hotels Ltde
High Court
09 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4200/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mummbai v. M/S Piem Hotels Ltde
Date of order
09 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/4200/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mummbai v. M/S Piem Hotels Ltde, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1027 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai. ... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Piem Hotels Ltd., Mumbai. ... Respondent.
Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
P.C.Tripathi with Dinesh Vyas for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 9th April 2007.
DATED : 9th April 2007.
DATED : 9th April 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant
and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. In the above appeal, the tax effect
involved is less than the amount prescribed in
Circular F.No.279/126/98-ITJ dated 27th March 2000
issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of
Finance (Department of Revenue), Government of India.
In view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain
this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue