Itxa/420/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-24, Bombay v. Late Smt Niranhjana N. Majithia
High Court
01 Sep 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/420/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-24, Bombay v. Late Smt Niranhjana N. Majithia
Date of order
01 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/420/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-24, Bombay v. Late Smt Niranhjana N. Majithia, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.420 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City 24, Mumbai... Appellantv/s.Late Smt.Niranjana N. MajithiaThrough L/H Shri Navinchandra N.Majithia... RespondentCORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED:1stSeptember, 2004P.C.None appears for the appellant. Dismissed indefault.2. The appellant is directed to recover the courtfee paid on the income-tax appeal from the officerdue to whose negligence the appeal came to bedismissed in default.3. Let the copy of this order be sent to theCommissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City 24, Mumbai,Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra(East), Mumbai.(R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue