Itxa/4209/2009 Of M/S. Unimed Technologies Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 32
High Court
22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4209/2009 Of M/S. Unimed Technologies Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 32
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/4209/2009 Of M/S. Unimed Technologies Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 32, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4209 OF 2009
M/s. United Technologies Ltd.
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-32 Mr. A.K. Jasani for appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ.DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010
P.C. :-
1.This appeal is against the order of the ITAT remanding the matter back to the assessing officer to consider the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Since the appeal is against the order of remand, we are not inclined to entertain the appeal. However, the assessing officer while giving effect to the order of the ITAT shall take into consideration the decision of this Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.Ltd. V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. reported in [2010] 328 ITR 81 (Bom). The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue