Itxa/4220/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7 Mumbai v. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd
High Court
14 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4220/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7 Mumbai v. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd
Date of order
14 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/4220/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7 Mumbai v. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4220 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Nicholas Piramal Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate i/b. A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the similar questions raised by the revenue in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No.4225 of 2009 is dismissed by us today i.e. 14[th] September, 2009. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue