Itxa/422/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Serene Diamonds Pvt. Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/422/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Serene Diamonds Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/422/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Serene Diamonds Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, appeal is dismissed. [H.L.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 422 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant-VIII, Mumbai.
V/s.
M/s. Serene Diamonds P. Ltd.... Respondent
Mr. A.N. Kotangale for the appellant.
Mr. F.V. Irani with Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &V.R. KINGAONKAR,JJ.DATED : 1st August, 2006
P.C.
.Heard Mr. Kotangale in support of thisappeal. Mr. Irani appears for the respondent. Therespondent is engaged in the business of import ofrough diamonds and export of cut and polisheddiamonds.While filing its return, respondentutilised the method of valuation of closing stock ofraw material. That method was held to be a propermethod by the Assessing Officer for computing incometaxable under the Act. All that, the Tribunal hasheld is that if this method is applied while computingincome taxable, the Assessing Officer cannot rejectapplication of the same method for claiming deductionunder Section 80HCC of the Act. This being the view
taken by the tribunal, in our view there is nosubstantial question oflaw, which requiresre-consideration. Hence, appeal is dismissed.
[H.L. GOKHALE, J.]
[V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.