Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/423/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/423/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S Gammon India Ltd. , Mumbai

High Court 21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/423/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S Gammon India Ltd. , Mumbai
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/423/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S Gammon India Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question of law sought to be raised reads as under :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that dumpers are commercial vehicles and, therefore, entitled to depreciation @ 50% / 25% ? " 2.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.423 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.423 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Gammon India Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.J.S.Saluja for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question of law sought to be raised reads as under :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that dumpers are commercial vehicles and, therefore, entitled to depreciation @ 50% / 25% ? " 2. We were taken through the order of the Tribunal and our attention was drawn to the finding of the Tribunal wherein the dumper is registered as heavy goods vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act and, therefore, the depreciation is allowed @ 50% / 25%. So far as the view taken by the Tribunal seems to be passed under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. We do not find any substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan