In Itxa/424/2010 Of The Commissione Of Income-Tax-Iv ,Pune v. Pandurang Sah. Sakhar Karkhan Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1805 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1806 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1807 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Pandurang Sahakari Sakhar Kharkhana..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeals.
2.The appeals are taken up for hearing at the request of learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that issue sought to be raised in the above appeals is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in (2008) 301ITR 191 (Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the above appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.