Itxa/425/2004 Of M/S Indusinsind Telecom Network Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle-6(1)
High Court
14 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/425/2004 Of M/S Indusinsind Telecom Network Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle-6(1)
Date of order
14 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/425/2004 Of M/S Indusinsind Telecom Network Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle-6(1), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 425 OF 2004
M/s. IndusInd Telecom Network Ltd. Mumbai .. Appellant v/s.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Mumbai ..Respondent
None for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 14[th] JUNE, 2018.
P.C.
1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back at the end of the board.
2.However, when this appeal was called out again, none appears on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. This for the reason that the parties and advocates have been put to notice on 30[th] May, 2018 that this appeal would be taken up today.
3.In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue