Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4254/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4254/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vii v. M/S Spectrum Business Suport Ltd

High Court 01 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4254/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vii v. M/S Spectrum Business Suport Ltd
Date of order
01 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/4254/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vii v. M/S Spectrum Business Suport Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: (B)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in allowing the disallowance of claim bad debts of Rs.78.52,561/- ?law, the ITAT is right in allowing the disallowance of claim bad debts of Rs.78.52,561/- ?

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 itxa4254-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4254 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Spectrum Business Support Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Ms. Vessanji with S.J. Mehta for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Two questions of law are raised by the revenue in his appeal, which read as under:- (A)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in treating the expenses incurred for updating software as revenue expenditure despite similar addition having been made in AY 1996-97 and confirmed by CIT(A) and assessee having accepted the same as capital expenditure ?law, the ITAT is right in treating the expenses incurred for updating software as revenue expenditure despite similar addition having been made in AY 1996-97 and confirmed by CIT(A) and assessee having accepted the same as capital expenditure ? (B)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in allowing the disallowance of claim bad debts of Rs.78.52,561/- ?law, the ITAT is right in allowing the disallowance of claim bad debts of Rs.78.52,561/- ? 2.As regards the first question is concerned, counsel for the revenue states that similar question raised by the revenue in the assessee's own case in Income Tax Appeal No.2320 of 2009 has been dismissed by this Court on 5th January, 2010. 3. As regards the second question is concerned, counsel for the revenue fairly states that the question is answered against the revenue by the Apex Court in the case of T.R.F. Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income-Tax reported in [2010] 323 I.T.R. 397 (S.C.). In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan