Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4310/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4310/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Star Ya Kalakar Com. Ltd

High Court 11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4310/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Star Ya Kalakar Com. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/4310/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 9 Mumbai v. Star Ya Kalakar Com. Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the ITAT was right in allowing the set off of income received as talent registration fees against the preoperational expenses.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4310 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-9 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Star Ya Kalakar Com. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b. Satish Mody for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the ITAT was right in allowing the set off of income received as talent registration fees against the preoperational expenses. Perusal of the order of the Tribunal, particularly para 3 therein shows that the Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that some of the expenses claimed by the assessee was revenue in nature and in view of the fact the assessing officer has not doubted the genuineness of the expenses, the Tribunal relying upon the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CIT V/s. Bokaro Steel Ltd. reported in 236 ITR 315 (SC) allowed set off of income of the assessee against the revenue expenditure and assessed the income as Nil. No fault can be found with the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan