Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/431/2005 Of Dr. Ramchandra D Pandit...

Itxa/431/2005 Of Dr. Ramchandra D Pandit v. The Income-Tax (16)

High Court 30 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/431/2005 Of Dr. Ramchandra D Pandit v. The Income-Tax (16)
Date of order
30 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/431/2005 Of Dr. Ramchandra D Pandit v. The Income-Tax (16), the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as not maintainable with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

- = : 1 : =- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.431 OF 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.431 OF 2005 Dr.Rameshchandra D.Pandit ..Appellant. V/s. The Income-tax Officer ..Respondent. Mr.J.D.Mistry with Vasanti Patel for appellant. Mr.Pankaj Kapoor with Parag Vyas for respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH AUGUST, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- . This is appeal filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 at the instance of the appellant-assessee challenging the 2nd Appellate order dated 8/11/2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘J’ Bench Mumbai in ITA No.3929/M/I97 for the assessment year 1990-91 whereby the appeal filed by the Revenue came to be dismissed though in the operative part it is stated that ‘for statistical purposes’, the departmental appeal is treated as partly allowed. However, fact remains that in substance it was dismissed though one of the findings recorded in favour - = : 2 : =- of the assessee has ben set aside accepting other alternate contention which was rejected by the Ist appellate Court. 2. It is needless to mention that no appeal would lie against the adverse finding if ultimate order in appeal is in favour of the person filing appeal in the higher Court. In this view of the matter, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as not maintainable with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan