Itxa/431/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Smt. Bhagyshree Prasad Patil
High Court
17 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/431/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Smt. Bhagyshree Prasad Patil
Date of order
17 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/431/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Smt. Bhagyshree Prasad Patil, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of Circular No.17 of 2019, the appeal is disposed of asinvolving low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
PRIYARAJESHSOPARKAR
Digitally signedby PRIYA RAJESHSOPARKARDate: 2022.08.1810:39:48 +0530
1
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.431 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income-tax-Central, Mumbai.
… Appellant
V/s.
Smt. Bhagyshree Prasad Patil
… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2022.
P.C.:-
1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect in thepresent appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019dated 8[th] August, 2019. It is stated that no instructions have been receivedfrom the Department to withdraw the present appeal.
2. In the light of Circular No.17 of 2019, the appeal is disposed of asinvolving low tax effect.
3. However, we observe that in case, the Revenue finds for some reasonthat the appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn in the light of theCircular, it would be open to the Revenue to file an application/preceipeseeking restoration of the appeal to be decided on its own merits.
4.Refund of Court-fees as per rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.