In Itxa/432/2009 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Enron Development Cotrporation Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The appeals seeks to raise the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was justified in upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting the levy of interest under section 234B of the Act ? " 2.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.432 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.432 OF 2009
Director of Income Tax
(International Taxation) ..Appellant.
V/s.
Enron Development Corporation ..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The
appeals seeks to raise the following question of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law the
ITAT was justified in upholding the order
of the Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting
the levy of interest under section 234B of
the Act ? "
2. The question of law sought to be raised in
this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court
in Income Tax Appeal No.1037 of 2008 [The Director of
Income Tax V/s. M/s.NGC Network Asia LLC] decided on 14th January, 2009. In this view of the matter, the
appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to
costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.