Case Law › High Court › Itxa/433/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/433/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Rachana Udyog

High Court 21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

21 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/433/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Rachana Udyog, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.433 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.433 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.433 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Rachana Udyog ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadaven i/b. K.R.Chaudhari for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Considering the tax impact is less than Rs. 4 lakhs, learned counsel for the revenue seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. 2. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.