Case Law › High Court › Itxa/435/2004 Of Commissionerof Income T...

Itxa/435/2004 Of Commissionerof Income Tax, City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Dharmesh Finance And Investment Co

High Court 19 Apr 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Apr 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/435/2004 Of Commissionerof Income Tax, City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Dharmesh Finance And Investment Co, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: 437 of 2004, there is no substantial question of law in the present Appeal, hence the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 435 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-III Quereshi Mansion, Gokhale Road, Thane .. Appellant V/s. M/s. Dharmesh Finance & Investment Co., D/34, Shree Balkrishna Apt., Dombivli .. Respondent Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 01.02.2005 DATED : 01.02.2005 DATED : 01.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. Perused the judgment and order dated 21.10.2002 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. For the reasons stated in the Income Tax Appeal No. 437 of 2004, there is no substantial question of law in the present Appeal, hence the Appeal stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.