Itxa/436/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 Mumbai v. Rita Sanu Bhattacharjee
High Court
21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/436/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 Mumbai v. Rita Sanu Bhattacharjee
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/436/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 Mumbai v. Rita Sanu Bhattacharjee, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals, are, therefore, dismissed in limini.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.434 OF 2009 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.435 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.436 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.437 OF 2009
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.434 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.435 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.436 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.437 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Smt.Rita Sanu Bhattacharjee ..Respondent.
’
Mr.R.Ashokan for appellant in all the appeals.
M/s.A.Khan for respondent in all the appeals.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Considering the tax impact, we do not
propose to entertain these appeals. The appeals, are,
therefore, dismissed in limini.
2. At this juncture, needless to mention that
the appeal filed by the revenue against the very same
assessee for the block period was also dismissed on the
same ground by an order dated 2nd July, 2008 in Income
Tax Appeal No.432 of 2006.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue