In Itxa/440/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Ajmera Steel Stripe Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 440 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ajmera Steel Strips Ltd.... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Ms.Vasanti Patel for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Both parties agree that by passage of time this appeal has been rendered infructuous. The statement made is taken on record. Appeal is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue