Itxa/441/2007 Of Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. Oman International Bank S.a.o.g
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/441/2007 Of Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. Oman International Bank S.a.o.g
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/441/2007 Of Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. Oman International Bank S.a.o.g, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 295 view thereof, appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.700 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.700 OF 2003
The Director of Income Tax
International Taxation ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Oman International Bank ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chattergi with Mrs.P.P.Bhosle for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that with
regard to the question of law raised in the appeal, the
same are squarely covered by the Judgment in the case
Discount & Finance House of India Ltd. V/s. S.K.
Discount & Finance House of India Ltd. V/s. S.K.Bhardwaj, C.I.T. & Ors. reported in (2003) 259 I.T.R.295 against the revenue in favour of the assessee. In
Bhardwaj, C.I.T. & Ors.
295
view thereof, appeal stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.