Case Law › High Court › Itxa/44/2005 Of Madhusudan C. Parikh v....

Itxa/44/2005 Of Madhusudan C. Parikh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xvi

High Court 06 Jun 2006 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Jun 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/44/2005 Of Madhusudan C. Parikh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xvi, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :---- .The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 44 OF2005 . Madhusudan C.Parikh... Appellant.V/s.Commissioner of Income-tax,City XVI, Mumbai... Respondent. Mr. B.V. Zaveri for the Appellant. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED : 6.6.2006. P.C. :---- .The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. The same is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as tocosts. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.