Itxa/443/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mbi City-18, Mbi v. M/S. Fashion Wear, Mbi
High Court
12 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/443/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mbi City-18, Mbi v. M/S. Fashion Wear, Mbi
Date of order
12 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/443/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mbi City-18, Mbi v. M/S. Fashion Wear, Mbi, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.686 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income tax .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Fashion Wear .. Respondent.
Mr.R.G. Bhat for the appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and
the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. We have perused the order of the Tribunal. This
appeal pertains to the AY 1991-92. In the above, the
Tribunal following its own earlier assessment order had
set aside the orders of the authorities below and
restored the matter back to the file of the Assessing
Officer. The Tribunal also had taken into account the
identical issues in the case of Dy. CIT V/s. Diamond
Creek.
3. In view thereof, there is no substantial
question of law, hence we are not inclined to entertain
the above appeal. The appeal stands dismissed as such.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue