Itxa/445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Hotel Diamond, Mumbai
High Court
26 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Hotel Diamond, Mumbai
Date of order
26 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Hotel Diamond, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.445 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.N.A.Kazi for the Appellant.
¦ Mr.P.S.Savla for the Respondent.
¦
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:26TH AUGUST, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for both
sides. The tribunal did not see any
reason to disturb the finding
recorded by the appellate authority,
because the appellate authority
recorded the findings after perusing
the entire record and findings were
essentially findings of fact. No
substantial question of law arises.
Hence, the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.