Itxa/449/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Associated Cable Pvt. Ltd
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/449/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Associated Cable Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/449/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Associated Cable Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.741 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.741 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Associated Cables Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Arun Sathe with Mandar Vaidya for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the respondent. Both the counsel fairly state that
the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in
the assessesee’s own case by the Judgment of our Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.Associated Cables P. Ltd. reported in (2006) 286I.T.R. 596 (Bom.) against the revenue and in favour of
I.T.R. 596 (Bom.)
the assessee. Hence appeal stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.