In Itxa/449/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. M/S. New Alfa Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
V/s.
M/s.New Alfa.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
Ms.Beena Pillai i/b. D.M.Haresh & Co.for the respondent.
P.C. :----
.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28th April 2009.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
admission of the appeal. Appeal is, thus, dismissed
in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue