Itxa/449/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Laxmi Satyapal Jain

Priya Soparkar 146, 54, 55, 64 to 66, 71, 78- itxa-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.800 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-20 … Appellant V/s. M/s. J J Hospital & Grant Medical College Employee Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.326 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax … Appellant V/s. M/s Urban Infrastructure Venture Capital P. Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.449 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax … Appellant V/s.Smt. Laxmi Satyapal Jain … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.327 OF 2018 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.328 OF 2018 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.333 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax… Appellant V/s.Shree Global Tradefin Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.601 OF 2018WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1274 OF 2018 Priya Soparkar 246, 54, 55, 64 to 66, 71, 78- itxa-o Pr. Commissioner of Income TaxV/s. … Appellant Dalwala Securities Ltd. … Respondent --- Ms.Padma Divakar for the Appellants. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2018. P.C.:- 1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Ms.Padma Divakar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that she has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….