Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd

High Court 01 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd
Date of order
01 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.453 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - III, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Blow Plast Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. 2. In so far as question of law (A) and (B) is concerned, the same are covered by the decision of this Court dated 1-12-2008 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1260 of 2005 in assessee’s own case. 3. In so far as question of law (C) is concerned, the amount in question has already been paid during the grace period. The issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.14 of 2000 decided on 25-11-2000. 6. In this view of the matter, none of the questions raised by the revenue can be said be substantial questions of law. Accordingly, the the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (P.B. Majmudar, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan