Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd
High Court
01 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd
Date of order
01 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/453/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S Blow Plast Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.453 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central - III, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Blow Plast Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2008
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
2. In so far as question of law (A) and (B) is
concerned, the same are covered by the decision of this Court dated 1-12-2008 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1260 of 2005 in assessee’s own case.
3. In so far as question of law (C) is
concerned, the amount in question has already been
paid during the grace period. The issue is
squarely covered by the decision of this Court in
Income Tax Appeal No.14 of 2000 decided on
25-11-2000.
6. In this view of the matter, none of the
questions raised by the revenue can be said be
substantial questions of law. Accordingly, the the
appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(P.B. Majmudar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.