Itxa/455/2003 Of Arakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14 (I)-4,Mumbai
High Court
14 Mar 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/455/2003 Of Arakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14 (I)-4,Mumbai
Date of order
14 Mar 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/455/2003 Of Arakesh Ramani v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14 (I)-4,Mumbai, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.455 OF 2003
Rakesh Ramani .. Appellant.
V/s.
Income-tax Officer,
Ward 14(1)-4, Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the appellant.
Mr.D.A. Dubey for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2005.
DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2005.
DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2005.
P.C. :
On the motion made by the learned counsel for
the appellant that the judgment of the Tribunal
impugned in the Tax Appeal has been recalled by the
Tribunal on a miscellaneous application made by the
assessee, the counsel is allowed to withdraw the
appeal.
2. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with
no order as to costs. The appellant would be
entitled to the refund of court fee as per law.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue