Itxa/457/2009 Of Delta Air Lines Inc v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Insternational Taxation Mumbai
High Court
09 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/457/2009 Of Delta Air Lines Inc v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Insternational Taxation Mumbai
Date of order
09 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/457/2009 Of Delta Air Lines Inc v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Insternational Taxation Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all the eight appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 457 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 458 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 459 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 460 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 461 OF 2009
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 462 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 463 OF 2009
Delta Air Lines Inc.
.. Appellant
v/s.
Deputy Director of Income Tax(International Taxation), Mumbai
..Respondent
None for the appellant
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 9[th] AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.
1.Today when these appeals are called out, none appeared insupport of the appeals. Therefore, these appeals were kept back. On
Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.13Jagtap10:53:51+0530
being called the second time also none appeared in support of theappeals.
2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting thepresent appeals. This is more particularly so as the parties andadvocate were put to notice on 27[th] July, 2018 that these appeals would
be taken up for consideration today.
3.Accordingly, all the eight appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.