Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/460/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax Cit...

Itxa/460/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax City-18 Mum v. Dias Anthony Mum

High Court 18 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/460/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax City-18 Mum v. Dias Anthony Mum
Date of order
18 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/460/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax City-18 Mum v. Dias Anthony Mum, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.460 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City 18, Mumbai... Appellantv/s.Shri Dias Anthony.. Respondent Mr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.T.C.Kaushik for appellant. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:18thOctober, 2004P.C.The issue raised in the present appeal iscovered by the Division Bench judgment of thiscourt in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co.P.Ltd.v. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr., 249 ITR265.2. However, the learned counsel for the revenuesubmits that the said judgment is under challengebefore the Supreme Court.3. Even if that be so, in so far as we areconcerned, the controversy stands concluded by theDivision Bench judgment of this court. 4. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan