Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/461/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/461/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii , Thane v. Shri. Shashi Aggarwal

High Court 04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/461/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii , Thane v. Shri. Shashi Aggarwal
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/461/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii , Thane v. Shri. Shashi Aggarwal, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 Commissioner of Income Tax-II....Appellant Shri.Shashi Aggarwal....Respondent.--- Mr.Bhatnagar with N.R.Prajapati, for appellant.Mr.S.Agarwal with M.Subramanium, for Respondent. P.C.:- 1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. So far as the first question isconcerned, it is an admitted position that when theassessee visited the convention at Glasgow though hevisited it as Rotarian and as tour operator, theexpenditure was not provided by rotary and therefore,in our opinion, the Tribunal has rightly said thatthe expenditure is business expenditure. 2.So far as the second question is concerned,it is common ground that it was a slump sale.However, according to the revenue, it was taxableunder Section 50 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunalhas rightly held that it will not be taxable underSection 50 of the Act but subsequently thelegislature has made specific provision byintroducing Section 50B and as section 50B was not inforce in the relevant assessment year i.e. 1998-99,the provision of Section 50B cannot be madeapplicable. No question of law arises. Hence, theappeal is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan