Itxa/464/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Thane-1 v. M/S. Cadbury India Ltd
High Court
05 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/464/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Thane-1 v. M/S. Cadbury India Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/464/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Thane-1 v. M/S. Cadbury India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 464 of 2006The Commissioner of Income TaxAppellantThane-1.Vs.M/s. Cadbury India Ltd.RespondentMr. P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Nishit Doshi i/b Prem J. Ranga, Advocate forthe respondent.CORAM : F. I. REBELLO &R. S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : MARCH 5, 2008P.C..As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4 lakhs,the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.Hence, appeal dismissed as withdrawn. The issue oflaw, if any, is kept open for consideration inappropriat case. Refund of court fees as per rules.[ R.S. MOHITE, J.][ F. I. REBELLO, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue