In Itxa/470/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iii v. The Bombay Burmah Trading Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.470 OF 2001The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.The Bombay Burmah Trading Co. Ltd...Respondent.Mr.A.S.Rao with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s. S.P. Mehta for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 30TH JANUARY,2008.PC :
1. The revenue has preferred this appeal on the
following question of law.
findings of fact no interference is called for. Appeal
is dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue