Itxa/479/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Accurate Minerals
High Court
08 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/479/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Accurate Minerals
Date of order
08 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/479/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Accurate Minerals, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal stands disposed of in terms of this order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.479 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-18 ..Appellant.
V/s.
Accurate Minerals ..Respondent.
Mr.K.R. Chaudhary with Mr.R.G. Bhat for the
Appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. It is clear from the order of the
tribunal that same view has been taken by the
tribunal in its earlier order relating to
assessment year 2000-2001. The learned counsel
appearing for the appellant - revenue fairly states
that the appeal filed challenging that order has
been rejected by this Court for non-removal of
office objections on 26-9-2007. It is an admitted
position that till today, no attempt has been made
to get that appeal restored. In our opinion,
therefore, the following order would meet the ends
of justice.
2. The appeal is rejected, in view of
rejection of appeal for earlier assessment year
referred to above.
3. However, in case the appeal relating to
the assessment year 2000-2001 is restored and
admitted, the appellant shall be at liberty to move
this appeal.
4. The appeal stands disposed of in terms of
this order.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue