Itxa/481/2004 Of M/S. Ushdev International Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 2(3)-4 Mumbai And Ors
High Court
19 Dec 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/481/2004 Of M/S. Ushdev International Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 2(3)-4 Mumbai And Ors
Date of order
19 Dec 2006
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/481/2004 Of M/S. Ushdev International Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 2(3)-4 Mumbai And Ors, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Issue: 2) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in upholding the action of charging of interest under Section 220(2) of the I.T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No.481 of 2004
with
Income Tax Appeal No.482 of 2004
M/s.Ushdev International Ltd. .. Appellant
v/s.
The Income-tax Officer & anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Atul Jasani i/by Mr.V.S. Hadade for appellant.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for respondents.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19th December 2006
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties
in both the above Appeals.
2. Both the above Appeals are filed
concerning the Assessment year 1997-98. In our
view, these two Appeals raise the following
questions of law:-
" 1) On the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, whether the ITAT was right in
law in holding that interest under
Sections 234-B and 234-C was chargeable
even in a case where the tax liability
arises only on application of the
provision of Section 115JA of the Income
-2-
Tax Act, 1961 ?
2) On the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, whether the Income-tax
Appellate Tribunal was right in law in
upholding the action of charging of
interest under Section 220(2) of the I.T.
Act, 1961 even in a case where the
liability consisted of only interest under
Sections 234-B and 234-C charged on the
tax liability arising consequent to
application of provision of Section 115JA
of the I.T. Act, 1961? "
Matter requires consideration. Hence, both the
Appeals are admitted. Mr.Kotangale waives
services for the respondents.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.