Itxa/482/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. Sanjev Wollen Mills
High Court
05 May 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/482/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. Sanjev Wollen Mills
Date of order
05 May 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/482/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. Sanjev Wollen Mills, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: Since the questions of law are covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) is a party, we dismiss both these appeals of the revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
1 itxa6850-10+1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6850 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12,Mumbai..Appellant.V/s.Monika India ..Respondent.
..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.482 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12, MumbaiV/s.Sanjeev Wollen Mills
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the appellant. Mr.S.P.Goyal – respondent in person.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 5TH MAY, 2015
P.C. :-
1.When both these matters were placed for admission and since they raise common questions, it is fairly conceded on behalf the revenue that a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.114 of 2012 and connected matters decided on 4[th] July, 2014 answers these questions against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.
2.Therefore, the view taken by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favour of the assessee deserves to be sustained. Since the questions of law are covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) is a party, we dismiss both these appeals of the revenue. They do not raise any substantial questions of law. There will be not order as to costs.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.