Itxa/484/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1,Mum v. M/S Royal Business Centre Pvt Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/484/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1,Mum v. M/S Royal Business Centre Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/484/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1,Mum v. M/S Royal Business Centre Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.All the five appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 292 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 306 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 484 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1Mumbai
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Royal Business Centre Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for the appellant
Mr. Deepak Tralshawala I/b V.S. Hadade for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 1[st] AUGUST, 2018.
1.These Appeals relate to Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2002-03.
2.Mr. Chhotaray, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenueinvited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax (CBDT). The aboveCircular directs the Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to theHigh Court where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. It also
directs its Officers to withdraw / not press its pending appeals wherethe tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fallin the excluded class of appeals listed therein.
3.In the above view, Mr. Chhotaray, learned Counsel appearing in
support of the appeal, on instructions from Mr. Mary M. Remedios, ITO1(3)(1), Mumbai, seeks to withdraw these appeals.
4.All the five appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
5.Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.