In Itxa/485/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Pune,I v. Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.485 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 4TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar KarkhanaLtd. reported in (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue