Itxa/487/2009 Of M/S Iris Properties Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai And Anr
High Court
09 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/487/2009 Of M/S Iris Properties Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai And Anr
Date of order
09 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/487/2009 Of M/S Iris Properties Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 487 OF 2009
M/s. IRIS Properties Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
v/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV & Anr.
..Respondents
None for the appellant None for the respondents
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 9[th] AUGUST, 2018.
1.Today, when this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in
support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back. On beingcalled the second time also none appeared in support of the appeal.
2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the
present appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties and advocate
were put to notice on 27[th] July, 2018 that this appeal would be taken upfor consideration today.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.13Jagtap10:53:54+0530
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue