Case Law › High Court › Itxa/49/1999 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax...

Itxa/49/1999 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. Mark Electronics

High Court 12 Jul 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Jul 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/49/1999 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. Mark Electronics, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Though, the above Appeal was admitted as far back as on 26.10.1999, till date the Appellant has not taken any steps to serve the Respondents, hence the Appeal stands dismissed in default.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 49 of 1999 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbaim .. Appellant V/s. M/s. Mark Electronics, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. G. Hariharan for the Appellant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 12.07.2005. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 12.07.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. Though, the above Appeal was admitted as far back as on 26.10.1999, till date the Appellant has not taken any steps to serve the Respondents, hence the Appeal stands dismissed in default. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.