Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4923/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4923/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 13, Mumbai v. Jaykumar B. Gala Mumbai

High Court 19 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4923/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 13, Mumbai v. Jaykumar B. Gala Mumbai
Date of order
19 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/4923/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 13, Mumbai v. Jaykumar B. Gala Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 19TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4923 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. Jaykumar B. Gala ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr. P.S. Savla for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 19TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.In the present case, it appears that the assessee had disclosed additional income of Rs.31,22,000/- received by way of gift by a letter addressed to the assessing officer after the notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, which was issued by the assessing officer. The finding of fact recorded by CIT(A) and confirmed by the ITAT is that there was no concealment of income and the assessee had offered the same to tax voluntarily. The decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact. No question of law arises out of the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan