Itxa/495/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India, Mumbai
High Court
13 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/495/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India, Mumbai
Date of order
13 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/495/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Jewel Of India, Mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.355 OF 2011ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.495 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.M/s. Jewel of India
..Respondent.
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate with A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2012
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the revenue in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No.
343 of 2011 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 13[th] January, 2012. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue