Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/504/2007 Of Motilal P Khinvasara Hu...

Itxa/504/2007 Of Motilal P Khinvasara Huf v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3)

High Court 28 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/504/2007 Of Motilal P Khinvasara Huf v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3)
Date of order
28 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/504/2007 Of Motilal P Khinvasara Huf v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 504 OF 2007 Motilal Punamchand Khinvasara .. Appellant v/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxPune ..Respondent None for the appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. DATED : 28[th] JUNE, 2018. P.C. 1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back at the end of the board.support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back at the end of the board. 2.However, when this appeal was called out again, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. This is particularly so as the parties and the advocates were put to notice on 15[th] June, 2018 that this appeal would be taken up today for consideration. 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan