Itxa/51/2003 Of Smt. Mohinibai S. Jain v. Asst. Comm. Of Income Tax Circle 5(2), Pune
High Court
17 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/51/2003 Of Smt. Mohinibai S. Jain v. Asst. Comm. Of Income Tax Circle 5(2), Pune
Date of order
17 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/51/2003 Of Smt. Mohinibai S. Jain v. Asst. Comm. Of Income Tax Circle 5(2), Pune, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.51 OF 2003
Mohinibai S. Jain.. Appellantv/s.Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, Circle-5(2), Pune... RespondentMr.A.K.Jesani i/by Mr.P.Y.Vaidya for appellant.Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.VijayKantharia i/by Mr.P.Kapur for respondent.CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED:17thSeptember, 2004P.C.Heard Mr.A.K.Jesani, the learned counsel the appellant and perused the order of theTribunal.
for
2. The Tribunal in its order observed thus-
"9. In the case in hand, during theassessment proceedings, the assessee isfound to have introduced her income underthe garb of NRE gift to the extent ofRs.3.00 lakhs in her original return andwhen investigation was carried out andassessee was summoned she found that she isunable to substantiate the claim of NREgift because the same was bogus as donorclearly denied about having made any gift,she filed a revised return declaring amountof gift as income from undisclosed sources.So this way, she concealed the income byfurnishing inaccurate particulars in heroriginal return of income. The submissionthat revised return filed was, according tothe assessee, voluntary and faithfuldisclosures cannot be accepted, becausemere filing of the revised return is notenough. The background and thecircumstances in which such return is filed
substantial question of law arises. Appeal is
dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.