Itxa/5139/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Shri Abdul Kadar N.shaikh
High Court
03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5139/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Shri Abdul Kadar N.shaikh
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/5139/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii, Mumbai v. Shri Abdul Kadar N.shaikh, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed has withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1141 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1141 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Abdul Kadar N. Sheikh ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kangoo for appellant.
Mr.V.S. Hadade for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
R.V.MORE, JJ.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
On instructions, the learned counsel seeks
leave to withdrawn the appeal. Appeal is dismissed has
withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(R.V.MORE, J.)
(R.V.MORE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue