Case Law › High Court › Itxa/516/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/516/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Thane v. M/S. H. L. Associates

High Court 01 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Feb 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/516/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Thane v. M/S. H. L. Associates, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 437 of 2004, there is no substantial question of law in the present Appeal, hence the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 516 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax-III Quereshi Mansion, Gokhale Road, Thane .. Appellant V/s. M/s. H.L. Associates, D/34, Shree Balkrishna Apt., Dombivli .. Respondent Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 01.02.2005 DATED : 01.02.2005 DATED : 01.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. Perused the judgment and order dated 14.2.2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. For the reasons stated in the Income Tax Appeal No. 437 of 2004, there is no substantial question of law in the present Appeal, hence the Appeal stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.