Case Law › High Court › Itxa/516/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/516/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(It)-3 v. Kpmg,Lodha Excelus

High Court 27 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

27 Sep 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/516/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(It)-3 v. Kpmg,Lodha Excelus, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.In the above view, all these Appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 401 OF 2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 V/s. V Hotels Ltd. Formerly Tulip Hospitality Services Ltd. … Appellant ... Respondent ALONGWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 416/2018, 419/2018, 423/2018,444/2018, 453/2018, 462/2018, 464/2018, 471/2018, 487/2018,488/2018, 506/2018, 516/2018, 520/2018, 533/2018, 535/2018,536/2018, 547/2018, 554/2018, 562/2018, 581/2018, 583/2018,589/2018, 594/2018, 608/2018, 613/2018, 614/2018, 617/2018,623/2018, 631/2018, 647/2018 AND 649/2018. Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 401/18, 462/18 and 631/18. Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 416/18, 419/18, 423/18, 444/18, 471/18, 487/18, 506/18, 516/18, 520/18, 533/18, 535/18, 536/18, 547/18, 562/18, 581/18, 583/18, 589/18, 594/18, 608/18, 647/18 and 649/18. Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 453/18, 464/18, 488/18, 554/18, 613/18, 614/18 and 617/18. Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondents in ITXA Nos. 401/18 and487/18, Mr. Sheeja John i/b. M.P. Savla and Co. for the Respondents inITXA Nos. 419/2018 and 520/2018. Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Respondents in ITXA No. 464/18 and471/18 Mr. Sanjay Sinha for the Respondents in ITXA 488/18 and 617/18. Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Respondents in 614/2018 Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar for the Respondents in ITXA No. 623/18.Ms. Rupali Vasaikar for the Respondent in ITXA No. 581/18. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : 27 SEPTEMBER 2019. P.C.:- In these Appeals the learned Counsel appearing for theAppellants on instructions seek to withdraw the Appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect involved in all these Appeals is less thanthe threshold limit of Rs. 1.00 crore provided in the Central Boardfor Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8 August2019. 2.In the above view, all these Appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn. 3.Refund of Court fees as per Rules. NITIN JAMDAR, J. M. S. SANKLECHA, J .

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.